-
Posts
10317 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
43
Everything posted by d00p
-
Froxlor showing PHP code after configuration step is finished.
d00p replied to Hai Tran Dinh's question in General Discussion
try this: a2disconf php8.1-fpm It looks like it's using the default alias -
Froxlor showing PHP code after configuration step is finished.
d00p replied to Hai Tran Dinh's question in General Discussion
well, i wanted the whole output, not your interpretation of what might be the issue...but fine. No idea where php8.1 is coming from for you, but bookworm uses 8.2 as default, see https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/php Froxlor uses the mod_php version used for the installation to set the php version for the php-fpm service which will be used by default. Also, froxlor will generate its own php-fpm sockets for itself and the customer-domain, the socket /run/php/php8.1-fpm.sock is definetly not created by froxlor. and oh well....if you'd rather reinstall again...then good luck -
Froxlor showing PHP code after configuration step is finished.
d00p replied to Hai Tran Dinh's question in General Discussion
Also, maybe better join discord so we can discuss and check more efficiently... -
Froxlor showing PHP code after configuration step is finished.
d00p replied to Hai Tran Dinh's question in General Discussion
whats the output of the finalizing cli command you've ran? -
Froxlor showing PHP code after configuration step is finished.
d00p replied to Hai Tran Dinh's question in General Discussion
Did you watch the setup-video on youtube? I dont know you setup, i dont know your domain, your ip, what you did on the installation etc.etc.etc - provide more details please. Otherwise my point is: works for me and plenty of other people -
Froxlor showing PHP code after configuration step is finished.
d00p replied to Hai Tran Dinh's question in General Discussion
Be sure to use the fqdn you've specified and possibly try an Apache restart (not just reload). -
Habe die Demo mal auf php8.3 gestellt - scheint soweit keine probleme zu machen. Müsste ich aber noch genauer testen
-
Die Infos kommen mit der v2.1 - siehe https://docs.froxlor.org/v2.1/general/installation/ Und nein, php-8.3 habe ich noch nicht getestet, wir konzentrieren uns im normalfall auf die default php versionen der unterrstützten Distros
-
SSL in den Einstellungen aktivieren, SSL IP/port erstellen, den Domains zuweisen und certificate setzen oder let's encrypt aktivieren
-
Immer gern
-
nicht das ich wüsste, hab schon einige upgrades gehabt, alles super nein die php.ini hat damit ja nix zu tun, kommt drauf an wie die application die mysql-datenbank anspricht, z.B. via mysqli oder PDO - froxlor z.B. nutzt PDO und da muss man nix in der php.ini einstellen wäre mir neu.
-
Froxlor showing PHP code after configuration step is finished.
d00p replied to Hai Tran Dinh's question in General Discussion
heres a video of a standard installation which works perfectly fine: -
Froxlor showing PHP code after configuration step is finished.
d00p replied to Hai Tran Dinh's question in General Discussion
Then something is not correct because your php does not get parsed. The default installation sets up php-fpm which only works if the domain resolves correctly and thus the webserver uses the correct virtual-host config. Did you try a simple "systemctl restart apache2"? Maybe the reload just did not do the job correctly...and by default you should not need to append the /froxlor path to the domain to access froxlor -
Froxlor showing PHP code after configuration step is finished.
d00p replied to Hai Tran Dinh's question in General Discussion
well your domain resolves to the ip-addresses: froxlor.haitran.me. 285 IN A 104.21.81.131 froxlor.haitran.me. 285 IN A 172.67.161.47 Configured in your froxlor seems to be 54.169.228.108 and an ipv6 -
Froxlor showing PHP code after configuration step is finished.
d00p replied to Hai Tran Dinh's question in General Discussion
In case the installation process went through successfully, you did specify a fqdn there, you need to use it instead of the ip address, because it's configured to use php-fpm. Try forcing the cron to regenerate all configs and see if there are any errors: /var/www/html/froxlor/bin/froxlor-cli froxlor:cron -fd -
And this is important why? the page was done in 2022...
-
Your JSON array is wrong, instead of "params":[{"email_part":"test86","domain":"domain.tld"}] just use "params":{"email_part":"test86","domain":"domain.tld"} Difference (as php would view it): [ "command" => "Emails.add", "params" => [ [ "email_part" => "test86", "domain" => "domain.tld" ] ] ] and the correct syntax: [ "command" => "Emails.add", "params" => [ "email_part" => "test86", "domain" => "domain.tld" ] ]
-
So by your question I guess it's not working? Why waste time for a meta question ... just post the error/response
-
simple, see https://docs.froxlor.org/latest/api-guide#_2-request-structure-layout You have a "command" part but your parameters are not in the "params" part
-
doch sicher...du weist doch dem kunden eine Subdomain zu, setz halt da den Server-Alias auf "kein Alias" oder "www-Alias" und dann kannst du wunderbar auch Let's Encrypt verwenden edit: du sollst ja nicht in froxlor einen Wildcard-Alias erstellen, sondern in der DNS Zone ...z.B. @ IN A 123.123.123.123 * IN A 123.123.123.123 Damit zeigt: "domain.tld" auf 123.123.123.123 genauso wie auch "irgendwas.domain.tld" oder "wasanderes.domain.tld" oder was auch immer
-
Alternativ setze halt für die Domain von der du Subdomains erstellst einfach einen Wildcard Eintrag...
-
Naja, das musst du natürlich beim entsprechenden Dienstleister machen der die DNS Zonen verwaltet wenn du keinen eigenen DNS Server via froxlor betreibst
-
Es ist nicht mal 2.1 released Aber schätzungsweise nicht vor Q4 2024, gibt viele Faktoren die da mit reinspielen, hauptsächlich aber wie immer Zeit, Zeit und Zeit
-
[gelöst] Froxlor 0.10.38.1 - seltsames Verhalten nach "Datenbankfehler"
d00p replied to df8oe's question in German / Deutsch
Dann steht es dir frei deine Ergänzungen wieder einzupflegen. Es ist opensource... Deinen PullRequest hattest du zurückgezogen weil du dich nicht weiter drum kümmern wolltest... -
[gelöst] Froxlor 0.10.38.1 - seltsames Verhalten nach "Datenbankfehler"
d00p replied to df8oe's question in German / Deutsch
Gibt es genau im gleichen umfang wie auch bei 0.10.x - bitte