kingsley ezenwa

without testing this, can say probability of this working is very very High. How do I know this; because I developed a custom built Framework which I use both personally and for some clients and this is very very similar to how I did it except that the array index e.g $sql_root[1] can be numeric or alphaNumeric. Thanks a lot; now I can go ahead with ma work.

Looking into the database table `panel_databases` , I can see a column called `dbserver` with Values all Zero. My question is, where is that value set ? and what's it's use ? How would it function had it been set to 2 ? What happens should we have like 2 or more external databases (non localhost Databases) ; how do we allow customers utilize them. Does the value of `dbserver` correspond to something such as DataBase Server0, DataBase Server 1, .... Really need help with answers please. Thanks

Allow customers to enable shell access for ftp-users</b><br><strong class="red">Please note: Shell access allows the user to execute various binaries on your system. Use with extrem caution. Please only activate this if you REALLY know what you are doing!!! Now am asking, what's the real Dangers in enabling this ? Would their commands be limited to their Space (more like CHROOT) or would it affect everyone else (other users) including the Host Machine itself . PSS: I asked this in here to avoid opening another unhealthy thread.

Wow Already implemented. Thanks Goodness

Hello Do this configuration / feature already exist in latest Froxlor version and if NOT, would love for OP (i.e @df8oe) to respond to @d00p's question so we could take a look. Often busy but willing to make out time especially since I have plans updating my Froxlor version. We really need a Plugin system for our darling Froxlor

Just downloaded the tarbal via https://files.froxlor.org/releases/froxlor-latest.tar.gz and a quick peep into .../froxlor/lib/init.php shows it still needs Composer for autoLoading. Am looking at doing away with composer completely hence willing to manually include files if possible. This is among other reasons to accomodatee changes I made on my previous Froxlor + I equally don't want composer anywhere close to Me. Yea composer might be cool but ...

Hello Been quite a while. Glad seeing the Good work happening here especially with all the interesting Updates. My issue is , I downloaded most recent version of Froxlor and can see a lot's changed including the fact You now need Composer to AutoLoad and install Certain Packages. Anyway I was able to Spin up a new VM where I tried installing Froxlor just so the Packages gets downloaded and I can see them now in Vendor folder. Anyway I have copied the entire Froxlor directory into my server BUT issue is I still need AutoLoad them BUT I still don't want any Composer so I looked into composer.json and tracked the files till I got to /vendor/composer/autoload_psr4.php and /vendor/composer/autoload_static.php hence I can make out their File Paths. I equally know the composer file (/vendor/autoload.php) is being included in the init file located in /lib/init.php . Now rather than blindly testing, I want to know if there are any negative impacts to individually including each files from /vendor/composer/autoload_psr4.php using include() or require() functions . return array( 'RobThree\\Auth\\' => array($vendorDir . '/robthree/twofactorauth/lib'), 'Psr\\Log\\' => array($vendorDir . '/psr/log/Psr/Log'), 'PHPMailer\\PHPMailer\\' => array($vendorDir . '/phpmailer/phpmailer/src'), 'Monolog\\' => array($vendorDir . '/monolog/monolog/src/Monolog'), 'Froxlor\\' => array($baseDir . '/lib/Froxlor'), 'Algo26\\IdnaConvert\\' => array($vendorDir . '/froxlor/idna-convert-legacy/src'), ); I believe I found a patern on how those files might have been included e.g 'PHPMailer\\PHPMailer\\' => array($vendorDir . '/phpmailer/phpmailer/src'), becomes require($vendorDir . '/phpmailer/phpmailer/src/PHPMailer.php') but then, I might be wrong. Really would appreciate your kind response and understanding

Am sorry BUT the English in your Announcement seems Huge for me. I just want to confirm / ask one thing - Has the API FROXLOR version already been merged into the current Master in Github ? I can see 2 Main Branches - Master and 0.9.x . Does the current Master already contain version 0.10.0 which is the API version ? What's the difference between Master and 0.9.x . and which should we download if downloading from Github. In a simpler way, is version 0.10.0 now the new Master Branch ? Hoping to hear from you. Thanks

I suddenly started getting such errors on an already Active FROXLOR installation in Production. Though the error only appears while I try navigating to the Admin Settings page, every other pages works perfectly Okay. What I did to remedy it was to edit FROXLOR's config file in /lib directory and change 127.0.0.1 To localhost . Yet to really understand why that suddenly started anyway.

Yea BUT you would end up making things more complex. A simpler solution would be to Reinstall the wordpress website OR copy Over the files to Froxlor and import the database to the database created and managed by FROXLOR

Nice and Great work doop . Really wished FROXLOR worked for me. Also did the overriding nginx try_files setting implementation make it into this Release ? Thanks