Jump to content
Froxlor Forum

llucps

Members
  • Posts

    76
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

llucps last won the day on August 20 2021

llucps had the most liked content!

llucps's Achievements

Enthusiast

Enthusiast (6/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

2

Reputation

  1. I also encountered this problem a couple of weeks ago, suddenly acme.sh was trying to renew one of my domains using ZeroSSL, when in all my settings I explicitly had Letsencrypt as CA. I managed to fix the problem by registering and account with ZeroSSL, it's just a command which registers an account bu using an email, as it's explained here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68538044/why-cant-write-certificate-crt-with-acme acme.sh --register-account -m yyyy@yahoo.com Once I did that then I was be able to create a new certificate with ZeroSSL, then because I didn't want to change Letsencrypt I forced a new certificate renewal by specifying /root/.acme.sh/acme.sh --home "/root/.acme.sh" --renew-all --debug 2 --log --server letsencrypt --force I still have no idea why acme.sh was trying to use ZeroSSL to issue new certificates, but it's been working fine since then.
  2. Yes that was it, I changed to https://deb.froxlor.org/debian and it wored. Strange that has been working all the years, anyway. thanks! Lluc
  3. Hi, Since yesterday, I've been suddenly receiving these messages from cron /usr/sbin/apticron; then /usr/sbin/apticron --cron; E: The repository 'http://debian.froxlor.org bullseye Release' no longer has a Release file. and with apt-get update it complains about not finding the Release file: Err:10 https://deb.froxlor.org/debian bullseye Release 404 Not Found [IP: 185.123.52.110 443] Reading package lists... Done E: The repository 'http://debian.froxlor.org bullseye Release' no longer has a Release file. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. I see the Release file for Bullseye on http://debian.froxlor.log.. Is anyone else having this problem? Or is it just me? Strange.. Thanks Lluc
  4. This also happened to me. What I did was first create the domain without SSL, and once done, this will add a A record for the new domain to the DNS and then I was able to create the certificate SSL with Let's encrypt. So basically I have to do it in two steps, this behavior I think is different when Froxlor was using certbot, I remember creating my previous domains and SSL certificates in one step. It's not a big deal but I just thought it was worth to mention. Is it also your case @d00p? Thanks,
  5. Yes that's what I thought I need to get used to systemd services syntax.. old habits Thanks,
  6. Hi @d00p, I just updated my server to Bullseye and although I had to reinstall mariadb, and also froxlor and some php7.4 packages it seems all is ok except with one thing bind9. After the upgrade the /etc/init.d/bind9 was missing.. the bind9 service is running fine because I can use service bind9 status and I see it running The problem is in DNS server reload command settings in Froxlor I had /etc/init.d/bind9 reload and obviously since it's not there it fails to reload the service. What I did was change the command to service bind9 reload and it seems to be working fine. My question is whether there should be really a bind9 in /etc/init.d When I installed bind9 again I get this message: Setting up bind9 (1:9.16.15-1) ... named-resolvconf.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting it. Processing triggers for man-db (2.9.4-2) ... /etc/init.d/resolvconf status is working fine ● resolvconf.service - Nameserver information manager Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/resolvconf.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (exited) since Sun 2021-08-22 08:03:27 CEST; 27min ago Docs: man:resolvconf(8) Main PID: 1774 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Tasks: 0 (limit: 4559) Memory: 0B CPU: 0 CGroup: /system.slice/resolvconf.service Do you have any idea whether there should be bind9 in /etc/init.d/? or just using service bind9 reload/restart/start is fine? Thanks!
  7. Congratulations! Just out of curiosity, I'm gladly surprise that Bullseye support has been added already. Does that mean that changes between Buster and Bullseye are not that big? Thank you @d00p!
  8. I understand.. I would change to openkdim, but since it's not supported and I'm a bit afraid to make the change in case I screw up my email setup. I'll leave the change I did to remove .priv from lib/Froxlor/Cron/Dns/DnsBase.php for the moment. I would really appreciate if you can add the option the chose both options on the dkim Froxlor settings so I can continue it to use it with dkim-keys for the moment. eventually I'll have to make the change.. I know. Thanks @d00p
  9. umm. sorry I'm not sure I quite follow you.. Do you mean that commit should be revert it? and leave the key name as it was: $privkey_filename = \Froxlor\FileDir::makeCorrectFile(Settings::Get('dkim.dkim_prefix') . '/dkim' . $domain['dkim_id']);
  10. Both .priv and .public files are inside /etc/postfix/dkim directory.. but I don't recall at all the the public keys were referenced on the dkim-config.keys file, I'm pretty sure only the private keys are referenced. So.... I just removed the .priv extension that was added to the commit https://github.com/Froxlor/Froxlor/commit/15a13a7783d85f77efe1619ed85bd46e9ad3935b so the dkim-config.keys looks for: *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim1 *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim2 *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim3 *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim4 *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim5 *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim6 *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim7 and it WORKS Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@xxxxxxxxx.com header.s=dkim1 header.b=MAWt7cPM; I don't know what to do now...
  11. Yes I posted the dkim-keys.conf on my previous post, which every line is for every domain I have on my system *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim1.priv *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim2.priv *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim3.priv *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim4.priv *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim5.priv *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim6.priv *@xxxxxx.com:xxxxxxx.com:/etc/postfix/dkim/dkim7.priv What I could try is to undo the .priv change on the commit you did on october the revert it how it was and see if it's working.
×
×
  • Create New...