llucps

Understood 👍 Thanks.

I recently upgraded one of my servers from 0.10.38 to 2.0.5 following the upgrade manual listed on the documentation, and all went well. This morning I saw there was an update to 2.0.7 and I updated with the the command ./bin/froxlor-cli froxlor:update And all went well as well. The weird this my Froxlor installation using the official deb repository wasn't were that I already updated to the latest 2.0.7 version. So I ran apt update and it also went well, but I already did have the latest version that I just installed. So, what's the best approach to update/upgrade Froxlor from now on? I'm a bit confused between apt update and the new Froxlor command ./bin/froxlor-cli froxlor:update Thanks.

I meant that as a compliment being the only thing I had to do following the migration guide which I re-read several times

Bravo! 👏👏👏👏 I had no idea that you're working on Froxlor revamp. It's been a nice surprise. Thank you! For the moment I just upgraded one of the two servers, the one with less services just in case. The only thing I had to do was commenting out the default_pass_scheme = CRYPT option Kudos to all the team @d00p P.D. I'm just curious about the new path to /var/www/html/ . Why of that change? Nevermind I see that that it was a frequent request https://github.com/Froxlor/Froxlor/issues/1068

Thanks @d00p!

Thank you!

I also encountered this problem a couple of weeks ago, suddenly acme.sh was trying to renew one of my domains using ZeroSSL, when in all my settings I explicitly had Letsencrypt as CA. I managed to fix the problem by registering and account with ZeroSSL, it's just a command which registers an account bu using an email, as it's explained here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68538044/why-cant-write-certificate-crt-with-acme acme.sh --register-account -m yyyy@yahoo.com Once I did that then I was be able to create a new certificate with ZeroSSL, then because I didn't want to change Letsencrypt I forced a new certificate renewal by specifying /root/.acme.sh/acme.sh --home "/root/.acme.sh" --renew-all --debug 2 --log --server letsencrypt --force I still have no idea why acme.sh was trying to use ZeroSSL to issue new certificates, but it's been working fine since then.

Yes that was it, I changed to https://deb.froxlor.org/debian and it wored. Strange that has been working all the years, anyway. thanks! Lluc

Hi, Since yesterday, I've been suddenly receiving these messages from cron /usr/sbin/apticron; then /usr/sbin/apticron --cron; E: The repository 'http://debian.froxlor.org bullseye Release' no longer has a Release file. and with apt-get update it complains about not finding the Release file: Err:10 https://deb.froxlor.org/debian bullseye Release 404 Not Found [IP: 185.123.52.110 443] Reading package lists... Done E: The repository 'http://debian.froxlor.org bullseye Release' no longer has a Release file. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. I see the Release file for Bullseye on http://debian.froxlor.log.. Is anyone else having this problem? Or is it just me? Strange.. Thanks Lluc

This also happened to me. What I did was first create the domain without SSL, and once done, this will add a A record for the new domain to the DNS and then I was able to create the certificate SSL with Let's encrypt. So basically I have to do it in two steps, this behavior I think is different when Froxlor was using certbot, I remember creating my previous domains and SSL certificates in one step. It's not a big deal but I just thought it was worth to mention. Is it also your case @d00p? Thanks,

Thanks @d00p 👍

Yes that's what I thought I need to get used to systemd services syntax.. old habits Thanks,

Hi @d00p, I just updated my server to Bullseye and although I had to reinstall mariadb, and also froxlor and some php7.4 packages it seems all is ok except with one thing bind9. After the upgrade the /etc/init.d/bind9 was missing.. the bind9 service is running fine because I can use service bind9 status and I see it running The problem is in DNS server reload command settings in Froxlor I had /etc/init.d/bind9 reload and obviously since it's not there it fails to reload the service. What I did was change the command to service bind9 reload and it seems to be working fine. My question is whether there should be really a bind9 in /etc/init.d When I installed bind9 again I get this message: Setting up bind9 (1:9.16.15-1) ... named-resolvconf.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting it. Processing triggers for man-db (2.9.4-2) ... /etc/init.d/resolvconf status is working fine ● resolvconf.service - Nameserver information manager Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/resolvconf.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (exited) since Sun 2021-08-22 08:03:27 CEST; 27min ago Docs: man:resolvconf(8) Main PID: 1774 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Tasks: 0 (limit: 4559) Memory: 0B CPU: 0 CGroup: /system.slice/resolvconf.service Do you have any idea whether there should be bind9 in /etc/init.d/? or just using service bind9 reload/restart/start is fine? Thanks!

Kudos to you @d00p! 👍 Thanks, Lluc

Congratulations! Just out of curiosity, I'm gladly surprise that Bullseye support has been added already. Does that mean that changes between Buster and Bullseye are not that big? Thank you @d00p!