Jump to content
Froxlor Forum
  • ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By mrairstone
      Guten Morgen,
      mir ist in Froxlor ein kleiner Fehler in Bezug auf CatchAll Email aufgefallen.
      Zum System:
      Debian 10, 64-Bit Froxlor 0.10.11 Postfix, Dovecot, Spamc Zum Problem:
      Beim Anlegen einer neuen E-Mailadresse kann man je Domain nur eine CatchAll-Adresse definieren. Wenn man jedoch eine bestehende E-Mailadresse bearbeitet, kann man dort ganz einfach auf CatchAll umschalten.
      Dadurch kann es passieren, dass mehrere Emailadressen unterhalb einer Domain als CatchAll definiert sind. Das ist mir erst aufgefallen, als ich E-Mails in meinem Postfach hatte, welche nicht für meine E-Mailadresse bestimmt waren.
      Da auf dem Account in Froxlor mehrer Nutzer zugreifen (Feuerwehr) und E-Mailadressen hinzufügen, ändern und auch löschen - habe ich erst sehr spät gesehen das mehrere CatchAll vorhanden waren.
      Wenn man eine Mail an eine E-Mailadresse sendet, welche als CatchAll definiert wurde, wird die Mail auch an alle anderen E-Mailadressen weitergeleitet, die unterhalb der Domain als CatchAll definiert sind.(Jedenfalls bei postfix)
      Temporäre Lösung:
      Damit eingehende Mails an eine vorhandene E-Mailadresse, welche als CatchAll definiert ist, auch nur im Postfach dieser E-Mailadresse landen, habe ich die SQL-Anweisung in der "mysql-virtual_alias_maps.cf" wie folgt abgeändert:
      query = SELECT destination FROM mail_virtual AS v, panel_customers AS c WHERE c.customerid = v.customerid AND c.deactivated = 0 AND (v.email = '%s' OR v.email_full = '%s') AND trim(v.destination) <> '' Ich habe das eben auch noch einmal in der Demoversion ausprobiert, Screenshot im Anhang.

    • By thunfischbaum
      Hi everyone,
      just a little problem here. I have severa domains registered on my froxlor installation and a different hostname of course. So let's say domain1.de is my hostname. The second domain, which is used by a customer is called domain2.de . When I view the mail.log I am not able to find my connection request. I do only see the bruteforce bots with example@domain1.de connecting. But any example@domain2.de request is not getting forwareded. I did configure the installation accordingdly with the provided templates.
      Best regards,
    • By nisamudeen97
      Our froxlor server is behiend NAT and it uses the local IP  We have enabled letsencrypt module in froxlor and tried validating SSL for a domain in the server.  SSL generation is getting failed with 403 error.  See the debug log information.      Replaced domain name and main IP.    Can any one help me regarding the issue.
      [information] Updating Let's Encrypt certificates [information] Updating domain-name.com [information] Adding SAN entry: domain-name.com [information] Adding SAN entry: www.domain-name.com [information] letsencrypt-v2 Using 'https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org' to generate certificate [information] letsencrypt-v2 Using existing account key [information] letsencrypt-v2 Starting certificate generation process for domains [information] letsencrypt-v2 Sending signed request to https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/new-order [information] letsencrypt-v2 Requesting challenge for domain-name.com [information] letsencrypt-v2 Got challenge token for domain-name.com [information] letsencrypt-v2 Token for domain-name.com saved at /var/www/froxlor/.well-known/acme-challenge/vkTyLi2ApfP9O9ou8GyDz6WQmB--HP4ULnU0fhjXI0k and should be available at http://domain-name.com/.well-known/acme-challenge/vkTyLi2ApfP9O9ou8GyDz6WQmB--HP4ULnU0fhjXI0k [information] letsencrypt-v2 Sending request to challenge [information] letsencrypt-v2 Sending signed request to https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/chall-v3/803008408/k46kFQ [information] letsencrypt-v2 Verification pending, sleeping 1s [information] letsencrypt-v2 Verification pending, sleeping 1s [error] Could not get Let's Encrypt certificate for domain-name.com: Verification ended with error: {"type":"http-01","status":"invalid","error":{"type":"urn:ietf:params:acme:error:unauthorized","detail":"Invalid response from http:\/\/domain-name.com\/.well-known\/acme-challenge\/vkTyLi2ApfP9O9ou8GyDz6WQmB--HP4ULnU0fhjXI0k [212.224.xxx.xxx]: \"<!DOCTYPE html>\\n<html lang=\\\"en-CA\\\" class=\\\"html_stretched responsive av-preloader-active av-preloader-enabled av-default-lightbox\"","status":403},"url":"https:\/\/acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org\/acme\/chall-v3\/803008408\/k46kFQ","token":"vkTyLi2ApfP9O9ou8GyDz6WQmB--HP4ULnU0fhjXI0k","validationRecord":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.domain-name.com\/.well-known\/acme-challenge\/vkTyLi2ApfP9O9ou8GyDz6WQmB--HP4ULnU0fhjXI0k","hostname":"www.domain-name.com","port":"80","addressesResolved":["212.224.xxx.xxx"],"addressUsed":"212.224.xxx.xxx"},{"url":"http:\/\/domain-name.com\/.well-known\/acme-challenge\/vkTyLi2ApfP9O9ou8GyDz6WQmB--HP4ULnU0fhjXI0k","hostname":"domain-name.com","port":"80","addressesResolved":["212.224.xxx.xxx"],"addressUsed":"212.224.xxx.xxx"}]} [information] Let's Encrypt certificates have been updated  
    • By thunfischbaum
      Hi everyone,
      I'm running a Debian 10 Buster Server with PHP7.3 installed. The PHP7.3 update is the new component in the system. since then, I can't find any Mailboxes. There are no folders in the var/customers/mail/[customer] directory.
      If you take look at the Screenshot, you see, that the E-Mail adress is existent in Froxlor. 

      Mail Bounce
      Mail Log
      If I missed a log, please let me know, so I can attach it
      Best regards,

    • By peterpan
      I have a domain equipped with a certificate from LE. The cert is valid another 2 months. Now I added a domain as an alias of the existing domain, but the certificate isn't updated to have the new domain as its SAN.
      How do I trigger getting a new and updated certificate? Should I delete the existing one?
      Thanks for helping out.
  • Create New...